Splitter Leading Edge Curves: Do They Actually Work?

Splitter Leading Edge Curves: Do They Actually Work?

Splitter Leading Edge Curves: Do They Actually Work?

CFD-Backed Aero Testing with Real Numbers – Part 1 & 2


At Nine Lives Racing, we don’t just guess—we simulate. In this two-part deep dive, we test the newest trend curved leading edges on splitters. The test using CFD simulations in TotalSim. This wasn’t just a surface-level experiment. We modeled multiple versions of a front splitter and studied how changes to the leading edge shape affect downforce, drag, and aero balance.


If you're building a track car and wondering whether rounding your splitter edge is worth the time, this is your post.


Part 1: The Splitter Nose Curve Test

We tested three leading-edge shapes:

  • 🟥 Flat nose (baseline splitter)

  • 🟧 Slight curve (gentle radius)
     

  • 🟩 "Elfe Shoe" (taller, sweeping arc)

All splitters were mounted to the same car model, tested at 150 mph, with the same wing configurations.



💡 Key Results from Part 1


Splitter Type Front Downforce (lbs) Rear Downforce (lbs) Total Downforce (lbs) Drag (lbs) balance
f/r
Flat Nose 261 155 372 444 58.2/41.8
Slight Curve 240 135 375 446 63.9/36.1
Elfe shoe 294 80 374 462 78.5/21.5

What the Numbers Tell Us:

  • The Elfe Curve splitter adds the most front downforce: +77 lbs compared to flat.

  • It does this at the cost of 75 lbs of rear lift, which ruins the balance of the car to 78/21.

  • Interestingly, to see such a strong shift and feel in this orientation, the car will be substantially slower. 


Part 2: Change the car to see if the lift is vehicle-dependent. 

In the follow-up video, we dug deeper using a different car that doesn't suffer from lift. Here’s what we found:



Test 2 conditions. Using our own race car, we added a .5"(13mm) radius curve and tested

 

✅ The Test:

  • Base test with a flat nose splitter 

  • Curve nose test, the slight curve, a .70" tall (NASA legal), thick part with a .5" radius. 

     


     

    splitter type  Front Downforce (lbs) Rear Downforce (lbs)  Total Downforce (lbs) Drag (lbs) balance
    f/r
    flat nose  543 852 1395 619 38.9/61.1
    curve nose  571 885 1457 625 39.2/60.8


     

🌀 Airflow Behavior:

  • With the slight curve, air enters under the car more cleanly and starts turning the diffuser on earlier.

  • No lift detected. On this car it was all good news. no balance shifts nothing. 

  • We gained More rear downforce than front, making this beneficial to cars with diffusers. 


The Takeaway: Are Curved Splitters Worth It?

Yes—if you know what you’re doing.

The Elfe-style curved splitter is a powerful tool for generating front grip. But was awful for rear grip.

  • Balance matters – You may need to run more rear wing to keep the car stable. on some cars 

  • Increased front downforce – the curve fired up the splitter and made more downforce. 

  • Note rear lift.  – do keep in mind that the curved splitter might sent more air over the top of a car and make rear lift. Do pay attention before entering very fast curved sections of track.  


    Download all the data from these tests here. 


🔧 Want to build your own curved splitter or tune your aero package?
Check out splitter kits, airfoils, and DIY components at
👉 9livesracing.com


Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.